Satellite photography alphabet

The Google Earth Alphabet has upper and lower case and numbers and punctuation formed inadvertently by geographic features visible from space.
(via Making Light)
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 |

(via Making Light)
Posted on November 04, 2009 at 05:31 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking Is The Next Competitive Advantage
By Roger Martin
Harvard Business Press; 208pp; $26.95
One of the most compelling examples in Roger Martin's new book is a personal tale from his own days as a consultant. Asked by a Canadian bank to come up with a new strategy to cater to high-net-worth clients, Martin and his team came up with a bold plan they thought might revolutionize the bank's entire business. The bank's chief executive met the excited presentation with one question: Had any competitor already gone this route? "No!" Martin replied brightly. "You would be the very first!" And with that the meeting was over, the idea was killed.
The story, and others in Martin's new book, The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking Is The Next Competitive Advantage, illuminates more than just the risk-aversion of so many members of the C-suite. Instead, Martin is calling for a new way of thinking to permeate business that embraces the tricky reality of executing innovation and in doing so transforms it into action. He calls the technique "design thinking" and argues that it provides the necessary balance between the poles of analytical and intuitive thinking that are commonly taught and nurtured in today's professionals.
Dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto since 1998, Martin has been a key figure in driving understanding of the concept of design thinking for some time now. Here he again outlines his theory that this perspective provides a new—to his mind, critically important—method of running a business in today's fiendishly complex world.
With examples from companies such as Procter & Gamble (PG) and Research in Motion (RIMM), Martin shows the power of design thinking in action. He also makes the case that it can—and should—be adopted by any department within an organization.
Indeed, the most interesting insights within the chapter on P&G are not the well-trodden stories of A.G. Lafley and Claudia Kotchka shaking things up by holding mandatory hands-on innovation workshops. Instead, it's the work of Filippo Passerini, head of P&G's global business services, that emphasizes the potential impact of the technique. By applying design thinking within the traditionally uncreative corporate engine room of the organization, Passerini brought about radical transformation that could both support and spearhead the turnaround of the company at large. Without this in place, the flashier, more talked-about product introductions would not have had the strong foundation needed to flourish in the marketplace.
Design thinking has received more than its share of attention in recent years, not least from magazines such as BusinessWeek. Somewhat inevitably, a backlash has bubbled up, with designers grumbling that the concept detracts from the purity of the design discipline itself, and some executives skeptical of its worth outside of design agencies or creative consultancies.
Smartly, Martin acknowledges the tension and he remains steadfastly nuanced in his own argument that balance remains the key. Sometimes Martin's language reflects his long tenure as a university professor, but bushwhacking through the academic terminology is a worthwhile exercise. An accountant can learn to embrace the concept of validity, or leap-of-faith ideas, through the help and guidance of a more creative thinker. Likewise, structure and data can help the free-wheeling, blue-sky dreamer make a difference. Neither can exist without the other for long, and Martin's is a clarion call for all parties to lay down their defensive weapons in order to move toward a culture of openness and acceptance that nurtures a culture of sustainable innovation.
And while Martin emphasizes that design thinking is of the utmost importance within the C-suite itself, he doesn't let readers off the hook. Instead, everyone can learn to become a design thinker, and should try to understand the position of their colleagues.
As he explains, his own mistake as an excited consultant pitching a new strategy to that Canadian bank CEO was to speak in the language of validity when what the CEO really needed to hear was the language of reliability. Had Martin reassured the chief executive that while there were no direct comparisons, some well-performing European banks had employed a similar approach with some success, the CEO might have been persuaded to take the leap. The purpose of this useful book is to equip the reader with the tools needed to make sure that happens.
Helen Walters is the editor of Innovation and Design at BusinessWeek .
Posted on October 29, 2009 at 07:12 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I've never been very good at learning a language. I was terrible in high school Spanish and couldn't grasp it at all until I started traveling to Mexico and had to learn at least enough to get by or starve. I tried to take up French some years back when I was working on a project in Paris and could barely retain enough to order in a restaurant or ask for directions on the street. I've been going to China every year for the past ten and I can hardly get beyond "hi", "how are you", "goodbye" and "thanks." Learning languages and how to play the piano are my biggest failings in life. Oh well, there's still time, some day...
On the other hand, I am quite good when it comes to making up new languages--if I do say so myself. Every new brand design project we take on requires that our entire team master the art of visual and verbal linguistics. If you think of any successful brand, you will no doubt know what I mean. The brands that have been designed in the best possible ways have their own proprietary language that tells their story, sets them apart from all the brands they compete with, and connects them in a very meaningful way to their audience.

The basic elements of a brand's visual language--type, color, photographic/illustration style and layout also establish a filter for making decisions on how to best "speak" from the heart. If all the basics are in sync, it will make choices like story, set design, talent, wardrobe, physical space, dialog and tone of voice easy to make.
It's really no different than being true to yourself when you speak to others about how you really feel or most importantly, who you really are. It's also the key to creating the world that surrounds you in a one-off, true to you kind of way. You already know the real you, from where you came, what got you here and what you stand for. These basics are the filter for designing your own language that sets you apart from everyone else. We all know the people who are most successful at this, as well as the brands that have been designed in a unique and meaningful way.
I can think of no better example of combining these two examples of originality--brand/person--in one piece of brand communication than this now somewhat old positioning spot from Apple that coincided with Steve Jobs retaking the helm and Chiat\Day's brilliant new phase of work with him. For my money, there has never been any brand that has so beautifully mastered the art of creating its own distinct language in everything they do.
Article location:http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/joe-duffy/duffy-point-view/when-great-design-becomes-its-own-language
Posted on October 15, 2009 at 08:35 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
As the center of economic activity in the developed world shifts inexorably from industrial manufacturing to knowledge creation and service delivery, innovation has become nothing less than a survival strategy. It is, moreover, no longer limited to new physical products but includes new sorts of processes, services, interactions, entertainment forms, and ways of communicating and collaborating.
These are exactly the kinds of human-centered tasks that designers work on every day, and over time they have evolved a body of skills to help them do it. It is time for this type of thinking—design thinking—to migrate outward and upward into the highest levels of leadership. Business leaders, hospital administrators, university professors, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) need to integrate the methods of the designer, just as designers need to broaden their reach from the crafting of objects to the shaping of services, experiences, and organizations. Design, in short, has become too important to be left to designers.
When I speak to CEOs, the question they most often ask is: "How can I make my company more innovative?" They recognize that in today's fluid business environment, innovation is key to competitiveness, but they are aware of the difficulties in focusing their organizations around this goal. "How can we incorporate the designer's creative problem-solving skills into our larger strategic initiatives?" "How can we engage a greater percentage of our workforce in design thinking itself?"
Steelcase (SCS)'s Jim Hackett and A.G. Lafley of Procter & Gamble (PG) are among a growing number of enlightened business leaders who understand that a steady flow of innovative products rests upon an underlying culture of innovation. While they are excited by the challenge of designing new products, they are even more excited by the challenge of designing the organization itself.
Since Hackett became CEO, Steelcase has come to look like a very different company from the one that offered the world the first fireproof wastebasket back in 1914. Once technology and manufacturing capability drove most of its new-product development. Now the innovation process at Steelcase works outward from the perspective of human-centered design thinking. This new approach is evidenced by Workplace Futures, a unit that operates as a kind of internal think tank and includes anthropologists, industrial designers, and business strategists who conduct observations in the field to gain insights into the problems of Steelcase's actual and potential clients.
Tricks from the designer's toolkit—user observations, brainstorming, prototyping, storytelling, and scenario building—are invaluable in building an innovation capability, but taken by themselves they are rarely sufficient. Over time, and after countless experiences with organizations throughout the world, we have learned that innovation has to be coded into the DNA of a company if there is to be large-scale, long-term impact. All the workshops and brainstorming sessions in the world would not have transformed Procter & Gamble if then-CEO Lafley had not designated a chief innovation officer, increased the number of design managers by more than 500%, and established what he calls his innovation "gym," a place to train managers in the new design thinking.
Companies such as P&G and Steelcase that make products and manage brands have a head start when it comes to transforming their internal cultures because they already have designers, and even some design thinkers, on their payrolls. In service organizations, that base of talent may not exist, and the challenge is greater.
Health-care provider Kaiser Permanente is a case in point. In 2003, Kaiser set out to improve the overall quality of the health-care experience from the point of view of both patients and medical practitioners. My design consultancy, IDEO, proposed that rather than hire a slew of internal designers, the existing staff should learn the principles of design thinking and apply them themselves. Over the course of several months we conducted a series of workshops with nurses, doctors, and administrators that led to a portfolio of innovations. One of them—a project to reengineer nursing staff shift changes—involved a strategist with a nursing background, a specialist in organizational development, a technology expert, a process designer, and a union representative.
Working with frontline caregivers at each of four Kaiser hospitals, the core team identified the problems that occur when shifts change. Departing nurses routinely spent 45 minutes briefing the arriving shift about the status of their patients. The procedures were unsystematic and differed from hospital to hospital, and methods used for compiling information varied from Post-it notes to numbers scrawled on hospital scrubs. Knowledge was often lost, and many patients felt the shift change created a hole in their care. What followed from these observations were the now-familiar elements of a robust design process—videotaping, brainstorming, role playing, prototyping—carried out not by professional designers from IDEO but by Kaiser's own staff.
The result was a complete change in approach. The first prototype, built in only a week, included new procedures and simple software that enabled nurses to call up previous shift-change notes and add new ones throughout their shifts. More important, patients were now part of the process and could bring up additional details important to them. Kaiser measured the impact of this change and found that the mean time between a nurse's arriving on shift and first interacting with a patient was more than halved. The innovation also had an impact on how nurses felt about their job. In a survey, one commented: "I'm an hour ahead, and I've only been here 45 minutes." Another admitted: "This was the first time I've ever made it out of here at the end of my shift."
The new procedure had an impact on patients and nurses but on its own was a long way from achieving the desired goal of a systematic improvement in the overall quality of health care at Kaiser. To achieve that, the core team of nurses, development experts, and technologists went from carrying out their own projects to acting as consultants to the rest of the organization. Through the Kaiser Permanente Innovation Consultancy, the team now pursues the mission of enhancing the patient experience, envisioning Kaiser's "hospital of the future," and introducing innovation and design thinking across the Kaiser system.
The design thinkers I have described here are not minimalist, esoteric members of an elite priesthood, and they do not wear black turtlenecks. They are creative innovators who can bridge the chasm between thinking and doing because they are passionately committed to the goal of a better life and a better world around them. In the process they are helping to make our societies healthier, our businesses more profitable, and our own lives richer and more meaningful.
From the book Change by Design by Tim Brown copyright 2009 Tim Brown (published by Harper Business, an imprint of HarperCollins Publishers)
Posted on October 04, 2009 at 07:02 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
This breathtaking place is a former Dominican church that was converted
into a new retail location for bookseller Selexyz Dominicanen. The
architecture firm was Merkx+Girod. From Design Top News:
The store demanded 1,200 sq m of commercial area where only 750 were available.
The initial idea of the client to install a second floor within the church was rejected by the designers, because this would completely destroy the spatial qualities of the church. The solution was found in the creation of a monumental walk-in bookcase spanning several floors and situated a-symmetrically in the church. In doing so the left side of the church remained empty while on the other side customers are lead upstairs in the three- storey ‘Bookflat.’
The ground floor gives room to several different book displays, information desks, magazine-stands and cash registers, all made of standard sheet materials in different colours and surfaces.
Merkx+Girod Architects: Bookstore Selexyz Dominicanen in Netherlands (Thanks, Lindsay Tiemeyer!)
Posted on September 24, 2009 at 06:29 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Last Friday, cities and towns throughout the world celebrated Park(ing) Day, an event created to bring awareness to the importance of using and enjoying public space. Witnessing all those swaths of pavement transformed into plant-filled community gathering spaces (Streetfilms.org has a short film of San Francisco’s Park(ing) Day) got me thinking about — given the tangential way my brain works — the process of land-banking.

Land banking — the strategic acquisition of land in advance of expanding urban development, and the holding on to it as long as possible to maximize profits — is especially pronounced in once-booming, now-busted city centers like Las Vegas, Baltimore and Phoenix, which by the way now has more vacant land than any other major city in the United States. With the economic downturn things have changed somewhat, but there remain huge amounts of empty lots being “banked” in downtowns nationwide, all waiting for a real estate recovery.
Of course, if an entity bought property for future development, it is understandable that they’d want to wait until it began to recoup its value before building on it. But cities across the country are now left to grapple with the grim reality of abandoned lots and buildings that leave gaping holes in our urban fabric.
The downside of this isn’t hard to discern: the streetscape is rendered not only uninteresting and unsightly but unsafe. Pedestrians stay away, and the streets become even less safe owing to a lack of what the urbanist Jane Jacobs famously referred to as “eyes on the street.” With no foot traffic, existing businesses suffer and new ones hesitate to come in. A similar condition emerges in a very different kind of urban setting, where traffic flow exceeds neighborhood capacity, pulling pedestrians off streets because of noise, fears about safety and general unpleasantness.
An innovative and practical concept for new urban parks most directly addresses the latter condition, but I can see it working in the former as well. San Francisco’s “Pavement to Parks” program creates spaces for people by reclaiming excess roadway, through the use of simple and low-cost design interventions. What’s innovative about these parks isn’t so much the design as the implementation. As Andres Power, urban designer at the San Francisco Planning Department explains, because there is no structure in place to do something like this “it fundamentally changes the old impasse of years of planning and just lets the space evolve over time.”

Pavement to Parks was given particular impetus by the success of similar projects in New York City, especially the recent transformation of Broadway from 47th to 42nd Streets, and 35th to 33rd Streets, where plazas and seating areas have been created in excess roadway simply by painting or treating the asphalt, placing protective barriers along the periphery and installing movable tables and chairs.
Similarly, PTP begins with the goal of “transforming a sea of asphalt,” says Power. A pro bono designer (one hopes a budget will emerge to pay designers for their efforts) works on each park (there are 12 scheduled to be finished through 2010; three have just been completed) with the mandate of using materials the city already has to maximize greenery and, says Power, “transform a sea of asphalt.”
This approach diverts resources that would have gone to landfill and keeps the budget of these interventions low. Composted soil comes from city landscaping and plants are either donated or purchased at cost. Volunteers, typically community residents, are mobilized to plant, motivated by the desire to beautify their streetscape and meet their neighbors. And as part of Mayor Gavin Newsom’s initiative to provide edible landscapes throughout the city, fruit trees will be planted at each location. The plantings also add storm water management capacity to streets.
One of the first three pilot parks was created to transform a dangerous and poorly conceived intersection (below) at 28th and San Jose Streets on the outskirts of San Francisco’s Mission District.
In 1947 San Francisco planned to build a new freeway here, and in preparation for doing so the city tore down or moved close to 200 homes in this neighborhood. The homes you see above on the right-hand side of San Jose Avenue were lifted and moved back onto their backyards to make room for the project. A protest stopped the freeway from happening, but little could be done in the way of reparations for these displaced families. Half a century later, some of those families are getting their yards back — though now they’re out front.

Landscape architect Jane Martin , who designed the San Jose/Guerrero park, had no problem finding treasure in the city’s trash: her park plan uses trees felled in a storm and old air ducting made from stainless steel as giant planters for a broad array of plantings ranging from agave to apple trees. Similarly, REBAR’s design for the park — REBAR is, not incidentally, the creator of Park(ing) Day — at lower Potrero’s Showplace Triangle transforms dumpsters into planters for its South African palette of plants, and uses old surplus granite countertops for bench seating. The first of the three projects involved the least intervention: Public Architecture at 17th and Castro transformed an unsafe and confusing intersection into a sidewalk café by simply blocking the area off with planters.
Though two pedestrian islands were depaved for the Castro project, the Pavement to Parks model is designed to be reversible, and pavement is typically undisturbed. The effort reflects a “renewed interest in what our streets might look like,” says Power, as well as “a pent-up desire to create public space.”
These plantings and plaza aren’t just about aesthetics: the expanding array of planting projects along with other traffic calming measures, dedicated pedestrian enforcement stings and new traffic signals, the collision rate for the 11 blocks on Guerrero between Cesar Chavez and Randall Street, where the San Jose/Guerrero park is located, has been reduced by 53 percent since 2004.
Of the two major public space projects in New York City this year, certainly the High Line has received the most press — and its near-universal praise is well-deserved. But it is the Green Light Manhattan project and Pavement to Parks that I think will have the greatest legacy. The High Line took 10 years and $152 million dollars to complete — that’s not a criticism of the project, but of the systems in place nationwide that force these sorts of projects, and really just about any project, to proceed at a snail’s pace and at astronomical cost.
Today, people and the cities they live in are short on cash but long on ingenuity (and on boneyards full of discarded materials waiting for inventive reuse). Programs like Pavement to Parks and Green Light Manhattan have an irresistible immediacy to them, and while they may not rival Olmsted or Field Operations (who designed the High Line) in their aesthetic, they make up for it in spirit and sustainability. And remember, these are being done for next to no money.
But back to that land-bank tangent. I know what you’re thinking: “Why give over valuable real estate for a picnic table and a couple of planters?”
You don’t have to give it up; let people borrow it. The barely discernible footprint (and next-to-nothing budgets) of these parks allows for temporality. Just look at the deal brokered for the recently inaugurated LentSpace on Canal, Varick, Grand and Sullivan Streets in Soho. It’s a model for citywide land use in New York and, indeed, any city or town cursed with empty lots; the Lower Manhattan Cultural Council has created an “in the meantime” activity for a vacant site awaiting future development. In the case of LentSpace, the developer, Trinity Real Estate, is providing a three-year lease — and receives a write-off in return. (One hopes Trinity will eventually give in to LentSpace’s request to remove the chain-link fence that still surrounds the space.)

Posted on September 23, 2009 at 07:44 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
| Sep 19, 2009 |
|
Fans of recycling |
Unwanted water tubes and plastic crates are part of the decor of a beauty services shop |
| By tay suan chiang |
|
About the only thing that is new at the Spa Esprit Group's newest
outlet at Wheelock Place may be how you look as you walk out of the
beauty services establishment.
Little else about the nearly 3,000 sq ft place which houses its three brands - Brazilian waxing service Strip, brow-grooming service Browhaus and facial service Mask - is new. Old furniture and assorted industrial objects such as a sink and plastic pipes have been recycled for the beauty spa's interior decor.A 1950s cake chiller has been turned into a cash register. Discarded kitchen cabinets have had their doors reupholstered with vintage fabric and now store beauty products. Even old copies of The Straits Times were used. Mr Jerry De Souza, the group's creative director and store designer, had initially wanted a display shelf made entirely of papier mache. 'We created three prototypes, which were tricky to build. But they couldn't stand and fell flat,' he says. In the end, the shelf was created using a recycled wooden frame covered with newspaper. Elsewhere, recycled items are purely decorative. The main reception counter is spruced up with repainted old compressor fans that appear like mini windmills. Wooden crates were taken apart then reassembled to create a feature wall. Plastic water tubes make another reception area inside look vaguely like a prop from a science-fiction movie. Mr De Souza has designed more than 30 outlets under the group, including Strip at Suntec City and Raffles Place and restaurants Barracks and Tippling Club at Dempsey. He had all along seen treasure in so-called junk, using recycled material such as reupholstered old chairs in the stores and eateries. This is the first time he is doing it on such a large scale. He says: 'Rather than spend money on new items, I decided to be creative and transform old, disused items.' Going green, however, does not mean going cheap. He says recycling 'definitely costs more as it requires more manpower, such as consultants and contractors to use unfamiliar materials, and more time and effort to get it right'. 'It is challenging to recycle material for commercial uses as the new furniture must be functional and durable for daily use. There are regulations set by the Singapore Civil Defence Force, such as those concerning fire safety, that we had to abide by,' he adds. About $300,000 was spent on renovation, interior decoration and customising old furniture for the store. The sum includes the cost of making prototypes such as the papier mache shelf and buying recycled materials. Mr De Souza says most of the recycled materials were bought from a scrap heap factory in Paya Lebar, where metal objects are usually melted and sold. Items such as the compressor fans cost about $80 each. Ms Janet Lim, Spa Esprit's public relations manager, says the company is taking small steps towards green conservation. She adds that more of the group's stores will be 'going green' in the future. Its second Skinny Pizza restaurant, also at Wheelock Place, will have seats made from restructured bicycle seats and tables made from bicycle wheels. It will open in November. The Wheelock beauty services store opened on Sept 1 and has already attracted the attention of shoppers passing by. Undergraduate Kelly Lee, 20, says: 'It's quirky and makes me think about how I can get creative with what may be junk.' |
===![]()
|
|
Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings. All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Condition of Access |
Posted on September 18, 2009 at 06:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Turning to Tie-Ins, Lego Thinks Beyond the Brick
Billund, Denmark
FROM the outside, there is nothing playful about the drab, two-story Lego Idea House here, where designers gather in whitewashed rooms to dream up new toys. But upstairs, behind a series of locked doors accessible only to employees with special passes, is a chamber that might as well be toy heaven for kids — and more than a few adults.
Multicolored Lego creations in every imaginable size and shape spill from the shelves, from Indiana Jones’s biplane to Darth Vader’s fighter. Boxes stamped “confidential” hold potential future blockbusters, like Buzz Lightyear, the hero of the “Toy Story” animated films, as well as a police station bustling with miniature cops and robbers.
“It’s our way of looking at the world,” says Soren Holm, the head of Lego’s Concept Lab. “We have happy criminals; even they are smiling. The sun is shining every day.”
While that may be true of Lego’s toys, until recently it was hardly the case for Lego’s bottom line. But five years after a near-death experience, Lego has emerged as an unlikely winner in an industry threatened by the likes of video games, iPods, the Internet and other digital diversions.
Even as other toymakers struggle, this Danish maker of toy bricks is enjoying double-digit sales gains and swelling earnings. In recent years, Lego has increasingly focused on toys that many parents wouldn’t recognize from their own childhood. Hollywood themes are commanding more shelf space, a far cry from the idealistic, purely imagination-oriented play that drove Lego for years and was as much a religion as a business strategy in Billund.
Just as the toys are changing, so is the company. Jorgen Vig Knudstorp, 40, a father of four and a McKinsey & Company alumnus who took over as Lego’s chief executive in 2004, made it clear that results, not simply feeling good about making the best toys, would be essential if Lego was to succeed.FROM the outside, there is nothing playful about the drab, two-story Lego Idea House here, where designers gather in whitewashed rooms to dream up new toys. But upstairs, behind a series of locked doors accessible only to employees with special passes, is a chamber that might as well be toy heaven for kids — and more than a few adults.
Multicolored Lego creations in every imaginable size and shape spill from the shelves, from Indiana Jones’s biplane to Darth Vader’s fighter. Boxes stamped “confidential” hold potential future blockbusters, like Buzz Lightyear, the hero of the “Toy Story” animated films, as well as a police station bustling with miniature cops and robbers.
“It’s our way of looking at the world,” says Soren Holm, the head of Lego’s Concept Lab. “We have happy criminals; even they are smiling. The sun is shining every day.”
While that may be true of Lego’s toys, until recently it was hardly the case for Lego’s bottom line. But five years after a near-death experience, Lego has emerged as an unlikely winner in an industry threatened by the likes of video games, iPods, the Internet and other digital diversions.
Even as other toymakers struggle, this Danish maker of toy bricks is enjoying double-digit sales gains and swelling earnings. In recent years, Lego has increasingly focused on toys that many parents wouldn’t recognize from their own childhood. Hollywood themes are commanding more shelf space, a far cry from the idealistic, purely imagination-oriented play that drove Lego for years and was as much a religion as a business strategy in Billund.
Just as the toys are changing, so is the company. Jorgen Vig Knudstorp, 40, a father of four and a McKinsey & Company alumnus who took over as Lego’s chief executive in 2004, made it clear that results, not simply feeling good about making the best toys, would be essential if Lego was to succeed.
“We needed to build a mind-set where nonperformance wasn’t accepted,” Mr. Knudstorp says. Now, “there’s no place to hide if performance is poor,” he says. “You will be embarrassed, and embarrassment is stronger than fear.”
But the story of Lego’s renaissance — and its current expansion into new segments like virtual reality and video games — isn’t just a toy story. It’s also a reminder of how even the best brands can lose their luster but bounce back with a change in strategy and occasionally painful adaptation.
Founded in 1932 on the principle of “play well,” or “leg godt” in Danish, by a local carpenter, Ole Kirk Christiansen, this privately held company had a very Scandinavian aversion to talking about profits, much less orienting the company around them.
Mr. Christiansen’s family still owns Lego and its business may still be fun and games, but working here isn’t. Before Mr. Knudstorp’s arrival, deadlines came and went, and development time for new toys could stretch out for years; in 2004, the company racked up a $344 million loss.
Now, employee pay is tied to measuring up to management’s key performance indicators (K.P.I.’s, in Lego-speak). And cost-saving touches are encouraged when it comes to designing new toys.
That has helped to lower development time by 50 percent, with some new products moving from idea to box in as little as a year. Mr. Knudstorp’s bottom-line-oriented team, meanwhile, has shifted some manufacturing and distribution from Billund to cheaper locales in Central Europe and Mexico.
Nevertheless, Lego hasn’t entirely shed its Scandinavian sense of social mission when it comes to making toys. It kept quality high and never moved any manufacturing to China, avoiding the lead paint scare and grabbing market share when rivals stumbled amid multiple recalls.
Now, with profits swelling and the turnaround firmly in place, Lego is preparing for a future that moves well beyond the basic brick but carries big risks as well.
Last month, it opened its first “concept store” in Concord, N.C., where parents can bring children for birthday parties and classes with master builders; another concept store is set to open near Baltimore this fall. It’s all part of a broader retail expansion that will give Lego 47 retail stores worldwide by year-end, up from 27 in 2007.
In 2010, the first board game designed by Lego will go on sale in the United States, while its new virtual reality system, Lego Universe, will make its debut on the Web, with children able to act out roles from Lego games and build toys from virtual bricks.
Video games — yes, Lego is there, too — are increasingly important to the company, as are Lego’s legions of adult fans, who can now buy kits to build architect-designed models of Frank Lloyd Wright’s Fallingwater and the Guggenheim Museum. What’s more, the company is in talks with Warner Brothers about a mixed live-action and animation Lego-themed movie that would move the company and its Lego brand even further into the Hollywood orbit.
“Developing a movie doesn’t come cheap,” says Soren Torp Laursen, a 23-year Lego employee who heads its North American operations. “But five years ago, we were in the midst of a crisis, and now we’re in a growth phase. We are definitely taking bigger risks than we previously did.”
WHILE that shift has disappointed purists and prompted worries from experts that some of what has long made Lego special may be in jeopardy, it’s paying off, at least in the short term.
Amid a 5 percent drop in total United States toy sales last year and the industry’s worst holiday season in three decades, according to Sean McGowan, an analyst at Needham & Company, Lego’s sales surged 18.7 percent in 2008. And despite a worsening global recession, Lego powered through the first half of 2009, with a 23 percent sales increase over the period a year earlier. It earned $355 million before taxes last year, and $178 million in the first half of 2009.
The numbers are all the more impressive given the sales declines this year at the two biggest toymakers, Mattel and Hasbro.
“I was stunned when I heard how strong Lego’s performance was,” says Mr. McGowan, who has covered the toy industry for 23 years. “How could an $80 Lego set sell better than a $10 action figure?”
The answer is as multifaceted as one of Lego’s most complicated brick creations — and, like the best children’s stories, contains elements of luck, hard work and the loss of innocence.
SOREN HOLM looks down at the machine gun atop Indiana Jones’s jeep and winces. By the standards of video games like Grand Theft Auto and of other childhood attractions, it’s mild stuff.
But here in Billund, toy weapons have always been a touchy subject. “I can tell you there’s been a lot of debate about how far we can take it,” Mr. Holm says. Right down to Indy’s gun? “Oh, yes,” he says slowly. “Oh, yes.”
Since Lego overcame its initial hesitation about rolling out a “Star Wars” series a decade ago because the word “war” would appear on the box, the company has grown more comfortable with conflict.
“We’ve opened up slightly,” Mr. Holm says. After all, he adds, “when you give boys a bunch of bricks, they build a gun.”
In fact, Lego has opened up more than slightly. Whether it’s the Star Wars Assassin Droids Battle Pack or the Indiana Jones Ambush in Cairo set — featuring a pistol-wielding Indy against a scimitar-swinging local — many of Lego’s most popular toys today seem inspired by the special effects and violence of the big screen.
In the United States, Lego’s biggest market and the biggest toy market in the world, games with themes like “Star Wars” and “Indiana Jones” were among the reasons Lego sales jumped 32 percent last year, well above the global pace. But experts like Dr. Jonathan Sinowitz, a New York psychologist who also runs a psychological services company, Diagnostics, wonders at what price these sales come.
“What Lego loses is what makes it so special,” he says. “When you have a less structured, less themed set, kids have the ability to start from scratch. When you have kids playing out Indiana Jones, they’re playing out Hollywood’s imagination, not their own.”
Even toy analysts who admire the company and its recent success acknowledge a broad shift. “I would like to see more open-ended play like when we were kids,” says Gerrick Johnson, a toy analyst at BMO Capital Markets in New York. “The vast majority is theme-based, and when you go into Toys “R” Us, you’d really be challenged to find a simple box of bricks.”
Lutz Muller, an independent toy analyst in Williston, Vt., who has long followed the industry, estimates that 60 percent of Lego’s American sales are linked to licenses, double the amount five years ago.
And the coming “Toy Story” sets have retailers salivating, as Disney prepares to release the latest movie in the hit series next June. “ ‘Toy Story’ is a fit made in heaven,” raves Jerry Storch, the chief executive of Toys “R” Us, which has increased the shelf space allotted to Lego in recent years.
Nevertheless, acquiring licenses to make toys linked to hot Hollywood properties like “Toy Story” carries risks. “It’s a slippery slope,” Mr. Johnson says, and today’s hit can quickly turn into tomorrow’s dud, adding volatility that Lego never faced in the past.
Indeed, unlike the Cabbage Patch Kids or Atari or the Beanie Babies, it was Lego’s seeming aloofness from the market that helped it endure, rather than ending up in the back of the closet like those toys of yesteryear.
For longtime Lego executives like Mr. Laursen, it’s a delicate issue, and his own comments echo Lego’s ambivalence over creativity and hallowed Lego traditions versus the appeal of more profitable, Hollywood-influenced toys.
He says that “we’re definitely more commercially oriented” and notes that licenses play a bigger role in the American market than overseas. But he says that “we’ve never sacrificed our values, and have never been a fundamentally profit-oriented company.”
In fact, he says that there is often a long debate about values when acquiring new licenses, and that “we’re far from always agreeing to take on new ones.” He won’t specify which movies or themes Lego has passed on, but says that “there are many licenses out there that represent a level of violence that is not suited to Lego and doesn’t fit with the trust of parents.”
As Lego ventures deeper into video games and virtual reality with Lego Universe, the question of violence, not to mention commercial temptations, will become only more charged.
One answer, Mr. Laursen says, is to make “violence not explicit, but humoristic.” For example, when a minifigure “dies” in a “Star Wars” or “Indiana Jones” video game, he dissolves into a pile of bricks and then springs back to life, cartoon style.
“We think kids really want to have this good-against-evil play; they want this fighting against each other,” says Charlotte Simonsen, a Lego spokeswoman. “But we want to do it with a wink.”
Analysts add that the recession has proved to be an unexpected boon for Lego, as parents favor spending more time at home with traditional toys instead of going out to the movies or taking trips with the children.
Even parents who won’t let video games in the house, like Alyson Richman Gordon of Huntington Bay, N.Y., say Lego has retained its innocence, especially when it comes to toys built around the traditional bricks. “It echoes back to a bygone era,” she said. “And I find as a parent that I’m drawn to things from my own childhood that inspired my creativity.”
Lester Munson, a father of two in Alexandria, Va., agrees, even though he sees a difference between the Legos of his own childhood and those favored by his 8-year-old son, Jonas. “The most exotic thing I could build when I was a kid was an ambulance,” he says. “Now Jonas can build the Death Star.”
“I still like Legos, and I’m 41,” he says. “Instead of watching TV or playing computer games, the kids are building something, and Jonas and I will build stuff together. The pieces and the sets are a lot cooler than they were 30 years ago, and if the price you have to pay is these tie-ins, that’s fine.”
IT’S not only children who fight over toys. John Barbour, a former top executive of Toys “R” Us, recalls “a series of truly frustrating meetings” with Lego officials in Billund and New York at the beginning of the decade, which climaxed when Mr. Barbour bluntly told them that Toys “R” Us cared more about the Lego brand than they did.
The most popular toys would run out, he recalls, and Lego was simply unable to ship more or manage the complex process of producing the plastic pieces for its most complicated sets.
That began to change in 2004, after Mr. Knudstorp took over in Billund and Mr. Laursen arrived at Lego’s regional headquarters in Enfield, Conn. Besides reaching out to top retailers and cutting costs, they untangled a supply chain that churns out 29 billion pieces a year.
The changes also filtered down to the ranks of Lego’s toy designers, says Paal Smith-Meyer, head of Lego’s new-business group. The number of different bricks or elements that go into Lego toys has shrunk to less than 7,000 from roughly 13,000, and designers are encouraged to reuse parts, so that a piece of an X-wing fighter from the “Star Wars” series might end up in Indiana Jones’s jeep or a pirate ship.
That’s very different from when Mr. Meyer joined Lego a decade ago. Though creating a mold to make a new plastic element might cost 50,000 euros. on average, he recalls that 90 percent of new elements were developed and used just one time.
Nowadays, Mr. Meyer says, “you have to design for Lego. If you want to design for yourself, go be an artist.”
For those would-be Lego artists out there, the company has created a Lego Certified Professional program, selecting adult Lego enthusiasts who don’t work directly for the company but whose creations are aimed at Lego’s vast population of adult fans as well as museum and gallery shows.
It’s part of another broad new effort at Lego — reaching out to those adult fans, who maintain thousands of Web sites and blogs, like GodBricks, which features Lego creations inspired by different faiths, and the Brothers Brick, which showcases all things Lego, whether a life-size Lego house, news, or advice on how to shine up yellowing bricks (hydrogen peroxide).
“There’s a huge community of people that treat Lego as an art form rather than just a toy,” says Andrew Becraft, a technical writer at Microsoft who created the Brothers Brick blog. His site pulls in 125,000 unique visitors a month, and Lego officials estimate that 915,000 people worldwide attended Lego conventions and other events in the first seven months of 2009. Five to 10 percent of Lego toys are snapped up by adults.
In the past, Mr. Knudstorp says, “we considered the adult fans like vintage cars, a bit bizarre.” But he called on another longtime Lego executive, Tormod Askildsen, to work with adult fans. Now Mr. Askildsen journeys to Lego conventions organized by adult enthusiasts, while working with 44 Lego “ambassadors” from 27 countries, seeking advice about new toys and heading off public anger when older lines, like Lego’s 9-volt train sets, are phased out.
Ultimately, Lego came up with a new, profitable train set, after inviting the 9-volt enthusiasts to two workshops in Billund to brainstorm and help design it. “If you rock the boat, people will notice,” Mr. Askildsen notes. “They were fighting furiously for us not to give it up, but we were able to turn tension into opportunity.”
The same might be said for Lego as a whole, as it navigates the fiercely competitive toy market and ventures into movies and virtual reality while clinging as best it can to the more innocent, Scandinavian values that made it so popular in the first place.
“In the end, you’ve got to go where your consumer is going,” Mr. Barbour says. “And the reality is that themes and movies are what kids want. There’s no point in developing the best product in the world if you can’t put it on the shelf.”
Posted on September 06, 2009 at 05:02 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Thumbing through his local Swedish newspaper, Göteborg resident Mattias Akerberg found himself troubled by a full-page advertisement for Ikea. It wasn't that the Grevbäck bookcases looked any less sturdy, or that the Bibbi Snur duvet covers were any less colorful, or even that the names given to each of the company's 9,500 products were any less whimsical. No, what bothered Akerberg was the typeface. "I thought that something had gone terribly wrong, but when I Twittered about it, people at their ad agency told me that this was actually the new Ikea font," he recalls. "I could hardly believe it was true."
Over its 60 years, Ikea has built a reputation as a purveyor of inexpensive but stylish home furnishings, selling everything from leather sofas to chrome toilet-bowl cleaners. Branding has been a large part of the Swedish chain's success — what urban dweller today, whether in Atlanta or Kuala Lumpur, doesn't recognize that bright blue warehouse, glowing like a beacon of fine living, at the side of the highway? And its signature typeface, a customized version of Futura, has long been an integral part of that brand. But with its 2010 catalogue now arriving in mailboxes, the supplier of headboards and coffee tables to the world's thrifty and trendy has switched to what it sees as a more functional typeface: Verdana. In the process, it has provoked an instantaneous global backlash, the kind that can only happen on the Internet. (Read about Ikea in TIME's Design 100.)
"Ikea, stop the Verdana madness!" pleaded Tokyo's Oliver Reichenstein on Twitter. "Words can't describe my disgust," spat Ben Cristensen of Melbourne. "Horrific," lamented Christian Hughes in Dublin. The online forum Typophile closed its first post on the subject with the words, "It's a sad day." On Aug. 26, Romanian design consultant Marius Ursache started an online petition to get Ikea to change its mind. That night, Verdana was already a trending topic on Twitter, drawing more tweets than even Ted Kennedy. (See TIME's Ted Kennedy coverage.)

IKEA's 2009 online catalogue uses the old typeface.

IKEA's 2010 online catalogue features the Verdana font.
All this outrage over a font? For some designers, it's an issue of propriety — Verdana, which was invented by Microsoft, was intended to be used on a screen, not on paper. "It has open, wide letterforms with lots of space between characters to aid legibility at small sizes on screen," explains Simon l'Anson, creative director at Made by Many, a London-based digital-consulting company. "It doesn't exhibit any elegance or visual rhythm when set at large sizes. It's like taking the family sedan off-road. It will sort of work, but ultimately gets bogged down." (See pictures of Microsoft.)
Carolyn Fraser, a letterpress printer in Melbourne, Australia, adopts a different metaphor to explain the problem. "Verdana was designed for the limitations of the Web — it's dumbed down and overused. It's a bit like using Lego to build a skyscraper, when steel is clearly a superior choice."
Others seem mystified by the choice to eliminate one of the chain's key identifying features. "The former typeface definitely better reflected Ikea's design philosophy, giving it a very special, unique flavor that actually fit the company's style," says Vitaly Friedman, editor in chief of the online Smashing Magazine, which is dedicated to Web design. "With Verdana being used all across the Web, Ikea's image not only loses originality, but also credibility and the reputation that the company has built since the 1940s."
The main complaint that online protesters have, though, is that the newly adopted font is plain ugly. Especially when it's enlarged to, say, the size of a catalogue headline. Or worse yet, a billboard.
So why would Ikea make such a change? The very ubiquity of Verdana seems to be part of the font's appeal. Freely distributed by Microsoft, the typeface allows Ikea to use the same font in all countries and with many alphabets. "It's more efficient and cost-effective," says Ikea spokeswoman Monika Gocic. "Plus, it's a simple, modern-looking typeface." (Read "The Store That Runs on a Wrench.")
"They went cheap, in other words," counters Bucharest designer Iancu Barbarasa, who blogged about the font change on his website. If he sounds somewhat bitter, there's a reason. With its attention to the curve of even a $9 lampshade, Ikea has become renowned for its understanding of good design. "Designers have always thought of Ikea as one of their own," Barbarasa notes. "So now, in a way, the design community feels betrayed."
Indeed, the desire to remind people — and corporations — that design matters is what spurred design consultant Ursache to start a petition asking Ikea to do away with the offensive Verdana typeface. "Look, I know this isn't world hunger," he says. "But if a company like Ikea can make this mistake, you have to wonder who is going to lead when it comes to design." (Read "Furniture for Everyone.")
Ikea has yet to respond publicly to the tempest. "I think it's safe to say we were surprised by the response," admits spokeswoman Gocic. As of Aug. 27, Ursache's petition had garnered over 700 signatures. That may not seem like a lot, but then there weren't many protests at first to a certain beverage company's announcement in April 1985 that it would be changing its flagship product. Just three months later, however, New Coke was gone. And that was before Twitter.
Find this article at:
http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1919127,00.html
Posted on September 04, 2009 at 08:57 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Penguin Books (Thanks, Spencer!)
Posted on September 04, 2009 at 10:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
By Joe Leahy in Mumbai
Published: August 31 2009 23:07 | Last updated: August 31 2009 23:07
When Volvo Buses appointed a youthful Akash Passey as its first employee in India in 1997 to develop its business in the country, he commissioned a consultancy to explore whether the idea was viable.
The consultancy returned with a 600-page report. Its conclusion? Do not bother. The price at which Volvo was looking to sell its buses – Rs4m ($82,000, €57,000, £50,000) – was grossly unaffordable in India. Locally made buses were selling for one-quarter of that.
“My response was simple – I took the report and went to the nearest dustbin and threw it in,” says Mr Passey, who wears frameless glasses and sports a neat black goatee that is just starting to show flecks of grey.
Volvo launched in India in 2001 anyway and within a few years created a new market. Today, “taking a Volvo” has become the generic term in India for riding an interstate luxury bus, no matter what make of vehicle it is.
The Indian market has become a rare picture of rapid growth for Volvo Buses despite the travails afflicting the industry globally during the economic crisis. To serve this growth, the company has opened a new coach-building factory in Bangalore, which has become its most efficient in the world. (See box)
Dash of colour
At Volvo’s new bus manufacturing plant in Bangalore, a stuffed toy tiger maintains a vigil perched on a rack at a gate on the edge of the plant.
The Hobbes-like tiger is there to scare away a troublesome group of monkeys that occasionally interferes with the plant by breaking lights and eating the seats of the buses.
This is the only monkey business that occurs at the plant, however. With a capacity of 1,000 buses a year and a workforce of 600, the plant has become Volvo’s most efficient, able to turn out a fully built-up bus in 20-25 days, down from 45-50 days when it opened in early 2008.
To increase efficiency, the plant is colour-coded. Operators wear blue, supervisors orange. Yellow lines outline the work areas. Tools are hung on boards that have the outline of each implement drawn on them – making it easy to see if any have not been put back.
There are also boards displaying mistakes made by the workers – bad welds or faulty parts. These are there to help workers learn from their errors and come up with innovations to avoid them in future.
“I noticed that Indian workers don’t want to show mistakes, they try to hide mistakes,” says a Swedish supervisor. “We see mistakes as treasures.”
Such has been the company’s success that it is hard to imagine the trials Mr Passey went through in those early days establishing the brand. In the process, he picked up some valuable lessons about introducing a luxury product into an emerging market, particularly in a country as cost- conscious as India.
“Even though globally we were a very big company here when we were starting, we were as good as nothing,” Mr Passey says in describing those opening years at the company’s headquarters on the edge of Bangalore, the information technology capital that is India’s version of Silicon Valley.
Before Volvo arrived, India’s luxury bus market had been little changed for decades. Most buses consisted of truck chassis built by domestic carmakers, Tata Motors and Ashok Leyland, with a rudimentary coach bolted on top. They were dirt cheap, selling for about Rs1.2m. And they were tough, rattling their way through the rutted roads of the Indian subcontinent from the Himalayas in the north to the lush jungles of Kerala in the south.
But they were uncomfortable. In spite of India’s soaring temperatures, they seldom had air conditioning. Baggage was often stacked on the top and exposed to dust, monsoonal rains and theft. The slow 110-120 horsepower engines roared and strained as they crawled up through mountain passes or tried to overtake on the crowded roads, radiating noise and heat through the passenger section. The open windows exposed passengers to dust and the cacophony of honking horns that characterises India’s roads.
For the business travellers who used these buses, it was difficult to turn up fresh at a meeting in their destination city the next day. That is if they turned up at all. The buses were maintained by the operators, mostly small “mom-and-pop” outfits, causing delays when they broke down.
Mr Passey, now managing director of Volvo Buses India, knew he had a vastly superior product. The Volvo’s 240hp-260hp engine, like all modern buses, was tucked comfortably away at the back, where it was less noisy and created more room for passengers.
It was twice as powerful as the conventional Indian bus, meaning the Volvo was fast. Business travellers could leave later and arrive at their destination earlier, making one-day business trips possible and saving on hotel bills.
The specially designed bus chassis meant the coach’s interior was spacious and could store luggage safely inside. The air conditioning and insulated body meant windows could be kept closed, keeping out road noise and dirt.
Volvo provided post-sale maintenance services, ensuring its buses had a working life expectancy of about 10 years compared with three years for conventional rivals. It also undertook to train drivers for its customers, so that they in turn could drive more safely and look after the bus.
The problem was Volvo’s high price tag and the increased fuel cost of running a bigger engine. When Mr Passey went around trying to sell his new product, operators laughed at him. Why spend more on a Volvo when passengers were willing to ride the inferior traditional buses? No one would agree to buy a Volvo.
“Of course, the resistance was very high. There were many places and many rooms out of which I was thrown,” Mr Passey says.
The only way to penetrate the market, he decided, would be to appeal directly to passengers. The reasoning was, once passengers had experienced a modern bus, they would never go back.
He decided to first seed the market. In 2001, Volvo supplied about 20 subsidised “trial” units to a selected group of operators.
The first step was to imprint on operators that Volvo’s promise of after-sales service was more than just words. Mr Passey quietly sent trainees to ride on each bus. When something went wrong, they would immediately report to him, allowing him to quickly deploy a service unit to the stricken vehicle. The operators began to realise the value of buying from a manufacturer that also maintained the vehicle. It enabled operators to forgo the usual investment in workshops and maintenance facilities and concentrate on selling tickets.
As word began to spread among passengers, operators found they were able to increase market share by using Volvos and they could charge 35 per cent more for tickets. To further stimulate demand, Volvo targeted that institution of the Indian small town – the cinema hall. Each time a Volvo service opened in a town, the company would run an advertisement at the local cinema during the interval.
“You had to do a lot of things to break the way business is done normally,” Mr Passey says.
After the initial years, Volvo rapidly began gaining market share. Today, India’s luxury bus market has become one of the world’s largest after China – with sales of 600-700 vehicles a year. Volvo has 60 per cent market share.
This market is attracting growing competition. Tata and Ashok Leyland have opened large new coach-building facilities for luxury buses, while international operators such as Isuzu and Mercedes are making inroads.
The challenge for Mr Passey is keeping market share. This year, he expects to increase sales by about 25 per cent, most of which will come from its new state-of-the-art plant in Bangalore, which has a capacity of 600 buses.
Volvo has also begun penetrating the intracity bus market, with sales to the governments of Bangalore and other metropolises. A government programme to procure 14,000 buses in the coming years under its Jawaharlal National Nehru Urban Renewal Mission is expected to provide further impetus.
He seems sanguine about the growing competition. As India builds more roads and its people get richer, he reasons, the overall pie for the bus market will only grow. “What you need for a bus is people, and we have no dearth of people in India,” says Mr Passey.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009
Posted on September 02, 2009 at 09:07 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Wiggling Their Toes at the Shoe Giants
TODD BYERS was among more than 20,000 people running the San Francisco Marathon last month. Dressed in shorts and a T-shirt, he might have blended in with the other runners, except for one glaring difference: he was barefoot.
Even in anything-goes San Francisco, his lack of footwear prompted curious stares. His photo was snapped, and he heard one runner grumble, “I just don’t want the guy without shoes to beat me.”
Mr. Byers, 46, a running coach and event manager from Long Beach, Calif., who clocked in at 4 hours 48 minutes, has run 75 marathons since 2004 in bare feet. “People are kind of weird about it,” he shrugs.
Maybe they shouldn’t be. Recent research suggests that for all their high-tech features, modern running shoes may not actually do much to improve a runner’s performance or prevent injuries. Some runners are convinced that they are better off with shoes that are little more than thin gloves for the feet — or with no shoes at all.
Plenty of medical experts disagree with this notion. The result has been a raging debate in running circles, pitting a quirky band of barefoot runners and researchers against the running-shoe and sports-medicine establishments.
Vibram, with its FiveFingers line, is challenging the traditional idea of a running shoe.
It has also inspired some innovative footwear. Upstart companies like Vibram, Feelmax and Terra Plana are challenging the running-shoe status quo with thin-sole designs meant to combine the benefits of going barefoot with a layer of protection. This move toward minimalism could have a significant impact on not only running shoes but also on the broader $17 billion sports shoe market.
The shoe industry giants defend their products, saying they help athletes perform better and protect feet from stress and strain — not to mention the modern world’s concrete and broken glass.
But for all the technological advances promoted by the industry — the roll bars, the computer chips and the memory foam — experts say the injury rate among runners is virtually unchanged since the 1970s, when the modern running shoe was introduced. Some ailments, like those involving the knee and Achilles’ tendon, have increased.
“There’s not a lot of evidence that running shoes have made people better off,” said Daniel E. Lieberman, a professor of human evolutionary biology at Harvard, who has researched the role of running in human evolution.
Makers of athletic shoes have grown and prospered by selling a steady stream of new and improved models designed to cushion, coddle and correct the feet.
In October, for example, the Japanese athletic-shoe maker Asics will introduce the latest version of its Gel-Kinsei, a $180 marvel of engineering that boasts its “Impact Guidance System” and a heel unit with multiple shock absorbers. Already offered by Adidas is the Porsche Design Sport Bounce:S running shoe, with metallic springs inspired by a car’s suspension system. It costs as much as $500.
Some question the benefit of all that technology. Dr. Craig Richards, a researcher at the School of Medicine and Public Health at the University of Newcastle in Australia — and, it should be noted, a designer of minimalist shoes — surveyed the published literature and could not find a single clinical study showing that cushioned or corrective running shoes prevented injury or improved performance. His findings were published last year in The British Journal of Sports Medicine.
Other experts say that there is little research showing that the minimalist approach is any better, and some say it can be flat-out dangerous.
“In 95 percent of the population or higher, running barefoot will land you in my office,” said Dr. Lewis G. Maharam, medical director for the New York Road Runners, the group that organizes the New York City Marathon. “A very small number of people are biomechanically perfect,” he said, so most need some sort of supportive or corrective footwear.
Nevertheless, a growing number of people now believe in running as nature intended — and if not barefoot, then as close to it as possible. They remain a tiny segment of the population — some would say fringe. But popular training methods like ChiRunning and the Pose Method that promote a more “natural” gait, as well as “Born to Run,” a best-selling new book about long-distance running by Christopher McDougall, have helped spur interest.
Proponents of this approach contend that naked feet are perfectly capable of running long distances, and that encasing them in the fortress of modern footwear weakens foot muscles and ligaments and blocks vital sensory input about terrain.
“The shoe arguably got in the way of evolution,” said Galahad Clark, a seventh-generation shoemaker and chief executive of the shoemaker Terra Plana, based in London. “They’re like little foot coffins that stopped the foot from working the way it’s supposed to work.”
The big shoe companies are clearly paying attention to the trend. Nike was first to market with the Nike Free, a flexible shoe for “barefootlike running” with less padding than the company’s typical offerings. It was introduced in 2005 after Nike representatives discovered that a prominent track coach to whom they supplied shoes had his team train barefoot.
But some in the industry are critical of the barefoot push. Simon Bartold, an international research consultant for Asics, said advocates of barefoot running “are propagating a campaign of misinformation.”
SPEND some time in Concord, Mass., and you might catch a glimpse of a fit 51-year-old man in a pair of funny-looking socks running down the bucolic streets.
Tony Post, chief of Vibram North America, in the company's thin rubber running shoes. He says the industry is due for a shake-up.
That would be Tony Post, the president and C.E.O. of Vibram USA, on a lunchtime run. And those socks? They’re actually thin rubber “shoes” with individual toe pockets. Called Vibram FiveFingers, they’ve been selling briskly to runners and athletes looking to strengthen their feet and sharpen their game.
When Vibram, an Italian company known for its rugged rubber soles, designed the FiveFingers a few years ago, company officials figured that they would appeal to boaters, kayakers and yogis. Instead, the shoes, which sell for $75 to $85, caught on with runners, fitness buffs and even professional athletes: David Diehl, the New York Giants tackle, trains in them.
Mr. Post, a shoe industry veteran, said he believed that the business was poised for a shakeup. “It used to be all about adding more,” he said. “Now, we’re trying to strip a lot of that away.”
Strange as they look, the FiveFingers shoes hark back to a simpler time. Humans have long run barefoot or in flat soles. Professor Lieberman’s research suggests that two million years ago, our ancestors’ ability to run long distances helped them outlast their prey, providing a steady diet of protein long before spears and arrows. More recently, at the 1960 Summer Olympics in Rome, Abebe Bikila, an Ethiopian runner, caused a stir when he ran the marathon barefoot and won.
Things changed in the early 1970s, when Bill Bowerman, a track coach turned entrepreneur, created a cushioned running shoe that allowed runners to take longer strides and land on their heels, rather than a more natural mid- or forefoot strike. Mr. Bowerman and his business partner, Phil Knight, marketed the new shoes under the Nike brand, and the rest is history.
At the same time, millions of Americans began taking up running as a pastime. Those twin trends ushered in a golden age of biomechanics research. “There was a lot of concern about injuries because of the boom,” said Trampas TenBroek, manager of sports research at New Balance. The logic, he said, was that “if you build a heel lift and make it thicker, you take stress off the Achilles’ tendon.”
Walk into a sports store today and you’ll see the results: shoes with inch-thick heels and orthotics designed to correct overpronation, supination and a host of other ills.
Mr. McDougall, the “Born to Run” author, ” said manufacturers, doctors and retailers were doing runners a disservice by pushing such shoes. “People are buying it thinking it’s going to do something for them, and it’s not,” he said.
Mr. McDougall’s book is centered on the Tarahumara Indians of Mexico, known for epic 100-mile runs with nothing on their feet but strips of rubber. The book has become something of a manifesto for barefoot runners.
After suffering chronic foot pain and being advised by sports medicine doctors to give up running, Mr. McDougall tried thin-soled shoes. Now, he said, he runs long distances without shoes — or pain.
THAT seems to be a common experience among barefoot converts. “When people get it, it’s almost biblical,” said Mr. Clark at Terra Plana. His initial line of minimal shoes, the Vivo Barefoot, is intended for walking; a performance model, the $150 Evo, is due at year-end.
Sales of minimalist shoes, while still tiny, are growing at a rapid clip. Mr. Clark figures that he will sell 70,000 pairs of minimal shoes this year, double last year’s volume. The shoes have sold mostly online and through 10 Terra Plana stores worldwide.
Vibram says sales of its FiveFingers have tripled every year since they were introduced in 2006, and Mr. Post said he expects revenue of $10 million this year in North America alone.
Many professionals agree that while barefoot running may have some benefits, those who are tempted to try running barefoot — or nearly so — should proceed slowly, as they should with any other significant change to their running habits. They also say that more research is needed.
Sean Murphy, engineering manager for advanced products at New Balance, says that there have been many studies suggesting “that shoes can correct biomechanical abnormalities and risk factors, therefore minimizing the likelihood of injury.”
When asked for an example, Mr. Murphy pointed to a 2006 study by three doctoral students that found that wearing the appropriate type of running shoe for one’s foot could reduce the shock of impact or unwanted rotation of leg bones. The study did not address injury rates.
AMID all the controversy, barefoot running and natural gaits are the subject of intensive research across the shoe industry. Companies don’t want to miss out if it turns out to be more than just a fad.
At New Balance’s sports research lab in Lawrence, Mass., Mr. TenBroek and Mr. Murphy are studying the biomechanics of running barefoot and in soles of varying thickness, while designing a “lower profile” shoe.
Asics, too, sees promise in this area. “As technology improves, we will definitely go to a more minimal style,” Mr. Bartold said.
Those big companies could end up profiting from the movement — or they could have trouble getting on board.
Danny Dreyer, the founder of ChiRunning, which uses the tai chi principles of harnessing energy and core muscles to promote a more effortless way of running, said he had worked with a few shoe companies to help design minimalist shoes. In each case, he said, marketing and profit concerns trumped design: “Their profit and direction is based on ‘More shoe is better,’ ” said Mr. Dreyer, who is also a long-distance runner.
Mr. Bartold of Asics, which has not worked with Mr. Dreyer, said the industry had runners’ best interests in mind. “It’s all about trying to protect the athlete,” he said.
Nike describes the Free, its minimalist shoe, as a “training tool.” It offers models with varying degrees of cushioning; they are priced at $55 to $110.
“The key is to offer a range of options, because every runner has different needs,” said Derek Kent, a Nike spokesman. “If you want that sensation of barefoot running, there is the Free, but if you want a product with a little more cushioning and support, we have that, too.”
While Nike would not disclose detailed sales information, Mr. Kent said sales of the Free were growing at double-digit rates, with sales in Japan and China especially strong.
Curt Munson, co-owner of Playmakers, a running shop in Okemos, Mich., said that in his conversations with major shoe companies lately, “they see that they need to address this” but “they’re just not sure how much.” But, he said, they must be thinking, “If we say this is the best, then are we saying that what we’ve done before is not good?”
The back-to-basics movement is more than a fad, said Mr. Munson, who runs in FiveFingers. “Most people are not ready to run barefoot,” he said, “but I do think they are ready to go back to ‘less is more.’ ”
Posted on August 30, 2009 at 03:54 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
We were wrapping up a meeting with a client who was developing a new neighborhood. Through a combination of field research, trend studies and historical analysis we defined a story and collection of artifacts and experiences that would make this place meaningful to potential residents as well as the neighboring community. After the meeting our client said, "I finally understand what you guys do. You orchestrate the obvious."
At first I resisted the idea. Innovation must include more than orchestrating "the obvious." But then I shifted my attention away from the "obvious" to the "orchestration." In an orchestration it's the collection of things that create value, not necessarily the things themselves. It's not the individual notes in the song, but the collection of those notes. When creating meaningful experiences, it is often this orchestration that is the primary source of value creation. Our client was able to put this into sharp focus.
A lot of companies struggle with the idea that this orchestration can create significant value. They are often looking for a silver bullet--a single product concept that they can patent and protect. But with experience innovation, the organizational device that holds a collection of products and services together is critical to value creation--the silver bullet is often a metaphor. A metaphor creates value by transferring associations from a previous experience to a new one. It functions as shorthand to help people understand the offering and what it means in their lives.

Only a handful of companies embrace the value creating power of metaphor. While other retailers were focusing on rearranging shelves and picking new colors and finishes, Apple, Whole Foods and REI redefined their respective categories by leveraging the power of metaphor to create a meaningful experience. In the Apple Store, the metaphor of a learning center helps you feel comfortable returning for help even after you purchase your computer; in Whole Foods, an outdoor bazaar shifts the shopping experience from being a chore to being fun.

At the outdoor retailer REI, an outdoor industry expo invites you to test and try gear before you buy. The elements within these stores are often obvious and shared by competitive stores. But, by orchestrating these obvious elements around a metaphor helped Apple, Whole Foods and REI redefine their categories and win in the market.
It's difficult for many companies to respect that something as intangible as a metaphor can create real value, but the numbers don't lie. In 2006, Apple's annual sales per square foot was $4,032, compared with Best Buy's $930, Neiman Marcus' $611, and luxury store Tiffany & Co.'s $2,666. On average Whole Foods and REI stores deliver two times the annual sales per square foot than that of the typical stores in their category.
Companies that are successful at delivering consumer experiences understand the value of metaphor. Are you using metaphors to create value?
Over the last several years the innovation discussion has shifted from a focus on product and business innovation to consumer experience. Companies are increasingly interested in creating value by delivering better consumer experiences, but many are not quite sure how to get there. The results have ranged from a proliferation of Apple-like Genius Bars to frustrated project teams whose projects never make it to market. These companies are finding it surprisingly difficult to deliver great consumer experiences. This week, Steve McCallion explores some of the challenges companies face when trying to deliver consumer experience innovation.
Read Steve McCallion's blog Beyond the Widget [1]
Browse more blogs by our Expert Designers [2]
Steve McCallion is a skilled innovation architect and brand strategist with a rare balance of design sensibility and strategic thinking. He has led groundbreaking work including redefining Umpqua Bank's role as an anchor for community prosperity, creating Sirius Satellite Radio's award-winning experience for the "iPod fatigued" and working with real estate developers Gerding Edlen to create more meaningful neighborhoods. His other clients include Xerox, Black & Decker, Whirlpool, FedEx, McDonald's, Coleman, Kenwood, and Compaq.
Steve's primary charge is to foster Ziba's consumer experience practice. He founded the company's award-winning Design Research and Planning practice group which has developed many proprietary research and design planning methodologies that have helped numerous clients understand the essence of their customers, win design awards, obtain patents and succeed in the market. He was named as one of Fast Company's Masters of Design in 2006.
Article location:http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/steve-mccallion/beyond-widget/creating-consumer-experience-innovation-building-value-metaphors
Posted on August 23, 2009 at 09:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I've always loved research. When the chips are down and I'm looking for the edge that will take a half-baked theory and make it into a concept, research can help to give shape to the fuzziness that is a hunch. Although I always strive to deeply understand any subject matter for which I'm designing, I don't have a formal design research background; most of what I know is the product of working with some really talented individuals at frog. They taught me rigor and process, and the value of solid, explainable underpinnings to my work. By Nick de la Mare
By: Nick de la Mare, Published: Aug 04, 2009

Posted on August 08, 2009 at 10:13 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
What Lego Can Teach Us
Source: http://creativity-online.com/news/what-lego-can-teach-us/138047
Lego's aesthetic of illustrated, staged, non-verbal construction is rightly considered a classic in the infographics space. Over the last few years I've completed a number of Out Of Box Experience (OOBE) projects for various clients, most often those in the medical category, and I often find myself going back to Lego for inspiration when tackling a new problem.
By: Nick de la Mare, Published: Jul 21, 2009

Posted on August 02, 2009 at 06:28 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
By Joel Alas
Published: August 1 2009 01:56 | Last updated: August 1 2009 02:01
![]() |
| A leading authority on type, Mike Parker is convinced that William Starling Burgess created the font we now know as Times New Roman |
The release of Starling in June presented not just a new font, but a challenge to the accepted history of one of the most widely used typefaces in the world. And after a lifetime spent in typography, Parker was well aware of the controversy he was getting involved in: typography may present a genteel exterior, but it’s an art form punctuated by bitter rivalries and rampant plagiarism.
The case that Parker makes about the real origins of Times New Roman stands on narrow foundations. The sole piece of surviving evidence for his version of history is a brass pattern plate bearing a large capital letter B. He holds the plate up to show the familiar form of the letter, its characteristic curves and serifs. The point, he says, is that such pattern plates represent a technology that was not used after 1915. The creation of Times New Roman was announced in 1932.
Eighty-year-old Parker is one of the world’s leading experts on type. As the head of typographic development at the once-formidable Mergenthaler Linotype company in New York from the 1950s to the 1970s, he had enormous influence over the fonts available to the American public. It was his decision to introduce Helvetica to the Linotype library, creating a design legacy still evident today. But ever since he received an invitation in the early 1990s to view some interesting archival material, Parker’s time has been consumed by the hunt to solve a mystery.
The invitation came from the late Gerald Giampa, an eccentric Canadian master printer who, in 1987, purchased the remnants of the Lanston Monotype company. Giampa delved into the company’s archive, where he claimed to have unearthed documents that refer to a typeface known only as Number 54 – the font, Parker says, that we now know as Times New Roman. Except that these documents dated from 1904, and bore the name of a different designer: William Starling Burgess.
“Gerald sent me some pattern plates and said, ‘Do these look familiar?’” Parker said. “I said ‘yes, they’re Times Roman.’ He said, ‘No, they’re much earlier than that.’”
William Starling Burgess was born into a wealthy Boston family in 1878, and is best remembered as an accomplished naval and aeronautical designer, the builder of yachts for the America’s Cup and aircraft for the Wright brothers. But before embarking on his stellar career on wind and water, Parker believes Burgess had a short but brilliant dalliance with typography.
![]() |
| William Starling Burgess |
Parker says that in 1921 Lanston Monotype tried unsuccessfully to sell the Number 54 font to a fledgling news magazine called Time. Sometime after that, Burgess’s drawings fell into the hands of Stanley Morison, a type consultant at the Monotype Corporation in Britain, by way of Frank Hinman Pierpont, an American who managed that company’s factory in Surrey and who made a career out of reviving old fonts.
In the early 1900s typography was progressing rapidly, but newspapers were failing to keep up with the advances. The Times of London used a chunky serif font that was hard on the eye and wasteful of ink and paper. When Morison criticised The Times for its typeface in 1929, the newspaper challenged him to come up with something better. In his writings, Morison says that he looked to old-style fonts for inspiration, and set upon modifying a 16th-century typeface called Plantin. A sketch sheet was handed to Victor Lardent, a staff illustrator for The Times, who finalised the design. The Morison-Lardent drawings were accepted, and on October 3 1932, The Times went to print with its proud new typeface.
Other accounts, however, suggest that the redesign was far more challenging than Morison admitted. He went through countless failed prototypes and even sought help from outside designers, including the eminent typographer Harry Carter, who sketched some proposals. Years later Carter’s son, Matthew, himself a celebrated typographer, found those rejected sketch sheets languishing in his father’s sock drawer. “When I asked what happened to them, my father just laughed and said Morison had never said a word in reply,” Carter recalls. Parker believes he knows why Harry Carter’s drawings were turned down – Morison had by then been supplied with the pilfered designs of Number 54 by Pierpont. Precisely how Pierpont came upon them, Parker cannot say, but he stands by the theory. “Morison knew no bounds,” says Parker, who has numerous anecdotes about their many encounters that paint a picture of a cunning and devious man. Morison never took credit for designing the font himself, but claims only to have “excogitated” it. Years after its release, he wrote of the only font that he is credited with designing: “It has the merit of not looking as if it had been designed by somebody in particular.”
To date, no one but Giampa and Parker have claimed to have seen most of the evidence that supports the Burgess story. Sadly, no one else is likely to have the chance to verify their claims. In 1918, a fire tore through Burgess’s shipyard, incinerating any documents that might have shed light on his activities during 1904, when Parker suggests he made the original drawings for the new font. On the other side of the Atlantic, a bomb blast near the London offices of Monotype Corporation in 1941 destroyed much information about Morison’s activities during the redesign of The Times’s typeface.
![]() |
| The surviving brass pattern plate at the centre of the font controversy |
In typography, there is no greater insult than the accusation of plagiarism. When Parker began circulating his theory about the origins of Times New Roman, he was howled down by a chorus of critics. British author Nicolas Barker, Morison’s biographer, labelled it “a misguided attempt to adjust history”. “It’s the creation of Mike Parker, who did it partly as a practical joke, and partly to help his friend Gerald Giampa,” Barker says. “Giampa was the potential beneficiary. Had he been able to demonstrate that the design had predated the UK version, there was the possibility to establish a patentable right to the designs, at least in the USA. That’s the only logical reason I can see for them wanting to produce this otherwise rather childish joke.” Parker responds that Barker is a “friend of Monotype” who has written many books and articles about Morison.
Barker and others say Parker has failed to produce any conclusive proof of his theory, but only colourful speculation based on unseen documents. Other critics include Jim Rimmer, a Canadian type craftsman based near Vancouver, who labelled Giampa a “pathological liar”. Rimmer said he had known Giampa for 35 years and called him a “prankster” who created the Burgess story “as a way of making himself look important”.
Matthew Carter, designer of the fonts Georgia and Verdana, is among those who believe the Burgess theory is “very plausible”. He has strong memories of Stanley Morison, a man he believes would stoop to such levels of deception. “I knew Morison and the company [British Monotype], and they were the most arrogant organisation in their heyday,” Carter says. “Morison was a very complex character. He liked playing jokes. He was interested in power, and he liked working behind the scenes. I can believe – though I still don’t know the truth – that he would have enjoyed taking part in a ruse like this.”
![]() |
| Top to bottom: A comparison of Times New Roman (Monotype 1931), Starling and Plantin (Monotype 1913, after Granjon ca. 1567). |
Before his death in late June, Giampa defended his reputation. From behind the counter of an antique and curiosity shop on the Vancouver waterfront, the colourful Canadian printer said he had “absolutely not” fabricated the Burgess story, but that it was based on the documents and pattern plates he had unearthed in the Lanston Monotype archive. All of those records were lost in the flood on Prince Edward Island, he said, aside from one pattern plate in the possession of Mike Parker. It is upon this pattern plate that the entire Burgess theory now hangs.
Along with the Starling roman font, Parker has released a matching italic series. He says that in 1904 Burgess drew just five letters of an italic to accompany Number 54 before abandoning typography for aviation. Parker has taken it upon himself to finish the job and has spent the past few years carefully drawing the graceful slanted figures of a rich italic.
“Morison’s was a dog of an italic,” he says of the existing Times New Roman version, which he accepts was a Morison-Lardent creation. “It didn’t match the roman at all. It was a standard Monotype italic.” Now Parker has set out to rectify this by giving the world’s most popular font – no matter its name or creator – a deserving italic. Aside from the five inspirational characters, this is wholly Parker’s own work and, remarkably, it is his maiden typographic creation. Throughout his decades in the industry, Parker remained a creative administrator and researcher but was never himself a typographer.
And this, perhaps, is the real force behind Parker’s enthusiasm for the William Starling Burgess story: it has given him, for the first time, the chance to create a font of his own.
Joel Alas is a freelance writer and editor based in Berlin
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009
Posted on August 02, 2009 at 05:10 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Face value
Flush with ambition
From The Economist print edition
Can Kunio Harimoto convert the rest of the world to the charms of the Japanese lavatory?
| |
![]() | |
IT IS the Lamborghini of lavatories, the Cadillac of commodes. With its sleekly sculpted basin, high-tech control panel, automatic lid, heated seat and built-in bidet, the “Neorest” is the sort of lavatory that would surely be used by James Bond. Or so Kunio Harimoto, the boss of Toto, believes.
Toto, based in Japan, is one of the biggest bathroom- and kitchen-ceramics companies in the world. It earns around ¥500 billion ($5 billion) a year, over one-third of that from lavatories and related accessories alone. It is best known for its “Washlet” range including the Neorest, which in addition to all its other functions hides odours and plays sounds like running water or birdsong to drown out embarrassing noises. Introduced in 1980, such sophisticated lavatories have become a national institution, found in 70% of Japanese homes. Until recently more households had one than had a computer. Toto, as the market leader and technological pioneer, sells 1.5m of them a year.
In other words Toto is a Japanese industrial icon. It was founded in 1917, as Toyo Toki (Oriental Ceramic), when it introduced Western-style sit-down lavatories to Japan—a farsighted move, considering the country lacked a sewage system at the time. Toto and its products became a symbol of modernisation.
But can Toto persuade Western consumers to modernise too? Mr Harimoto, who was appointed president of the firm in April, believes it can. Like many Japanese bosses, he has worked his way up slowly through the ranks. He joined Toto straight from Waseda University in 1973. Yet his management is far from traditional. During an interview, he readily consulted his aides when he did not know something, and they in turn felt comfortable interrupting him to correct the odd fact or figure. This sort of behaviour is almost unheard of in Japan, where underlings rarely dare contradict the boss and the atmosphere tends to be icily formal. Even Mr Harimoto’s usual attire—a blazer, open collared shirt and tan trousers—is a break with Japanese business convention.
His plans are radical too: he is embarking on a big effort to extend Toto’s international presence. The company already earns around 15% of its income abroad, mainly in China, other Asian countries and the Americas. Yet most of its foreign customers opt for less sophisticated (and less profitable) products. The firm also makes squat lavatories, for example—a far cry from their high-tech cousins, which can cost more than $5,000.
In America, where bidets are considered effete if not downright twisted, Toto sells fewer than 2,000 fancy lavatories a year (although they are beloved by film stars such as Charlie Sheen and Whoopi Goldberg, among others). In Europe, too, it faces formidable obstacles, including a dense thicket of national regulations. They cover everything from the use of bronze or brass in the fixtures (depending on how “hard” or “soft” the local water is) to the degree of water pressure that the lavatory is capable of withstanding. The panoply of rules destroys economies of scale while protecting domestic manufacturers, explains Mr Harimoto, as Toto must produce different lavatories for each European country. It took the firm’s staff a full year to redesign the products to meet all these regulations, he laments.
Moreover, high-tech lavatories succeeded in Japan for unique reasons. Houses are generally small and many generations live together. Bathrooms are often the only place where there is any privacy, so homeowners are willing to spend more on them. Dwellings are kept cold in winter, so a warm seat is priceless. And lavatories like the Washlet appeal to Japanese fetishes for both gadgets and cleanliness.
Mr Harimoto, however, has spent his career in sales and marketing, and so has some ideas about how to introduce Westerners to the pleasures of the luxury loo. In China, he notes, a Washlet is an aspirational item, a mark of success. To help foster that image, and to spread awareness of the product, the firm made a big effort to sell them to developers of landmark buildings, from the Olympic stadium to the national theatre.
In Europe and America, too, Toto is attempting to place Washlets in prominent public locations. It is even providing maps to them, so the curious can seek them out and try them. It is a strategy the firm first developed in its home market, when it published a map of Washlets in the shops and restaurants of the grand Ginza shopping district, thereby reinforcing its ritzy image and providing potential customers with a free trial all at the same time. Mr Harimoto is also overseeing the launch of a handful of retail showrooms—Toto calls them “galleries”—in posh American cities like Fort Lauderdale, Florida and West Hollywood, California, to woo customers. In other words, Mr Harimoto aims to transform the humble lavatory into a chic luxury product.
Mr Harimoto also has an environmental sales pitch. The Washlet’s highly engineered tornado-style flush uses 4.8 litres of water, compared with six or more in humbler lavatories. True, high-tech lavatories are energy hogs, accounting for 4% of household energy consumption in Japan—more than clothes dryers or dishwashers. But Toto has developed a fix for that as well: its lavatories boast software that “learns” what the typical pattern of use is in each household, so it can power down during quiet periods.
Mr Harimoto brims with pride about Toto’s 800 engineers and research budget of ¥12 billion to devise these sorts of innovations. But even they will have a hard time getting around the biggest obstacle to the use of its fancier lavatories in the West: the lack of electrical sockets in bathrooms. Japanese builders have been persuaded to install them behind the bowls as a matter of routine. Mr Harimoto is confident that Westerners will gradually adapt to lavatories like the Washlet too. “It took around 20 years before it became popular in Japan,” Mr Harimoto says, “We need to be patient.”
| Copyright © 2009 The Economist Newspaper and The Economist Group. All rights reserved. |
Posted on July 27, 2009 at 06:49 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Site Wins Fashion Fans by Letting Them Design
The fashion Web site Polyvore allows users to build collages with photos of clothing, accessories and models that they think go well together.
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — The fashion magazines Vogue, InStyle and Lucky may rule the newsstand racks. But online, they are also-rans, overlooked by the fashion-conscious in favor of Polyvore, an upstart Web site far from Fifth Avenue.
Polyvore is a user-generated fashion magazine filled with user-generated ads. The people who go to it play fashion editor and create collages featuring pictures of clothes, accessories and models from across the Web. Readers view the collages, which the site calls “sets,” and if they click on a dress or necklace, they are taken to the Web site that sells it.
Founded by three ex-Yahoo engineers, Polyvore has been focused on getting people to visit the site. It seems to be working. Polyvore had more than 835,000 unique visitors in June, almost 25 percent more than the traffic to Style.com, run by Vogue, and InStyle.com, according to Compete, a Web analytics firm. It is also far bigger than the Web sites of Lucky and Harper’s Bazaar. While other fashion magazine sites have been struggling to hold an online audience, Polyvore has tripled its traffic in the last year.
Now it is shifting its focus to making money. It runs ads, like the magazine sites do. But it also earns a commission when users click on or purchase clothes from certain e-commerce sites, though only about a quarter of outbound clicks make money for Polyvore. The company is now trying to forge relationships with clothing and accessories sites in return for uploading their product catalogues to the site.
“To compete with the Vogues and InStyles, it’s not just about transacting and maximizing the dollars per page view,” said Peter Fenton, a partner at Benchmark Capital, which invested $2.5 million in Polyvore. “There’s this aspirational side and entertainment side, which none of the sites up until now have done a good job at tapping into.”
At the same time, Polyvore is giving stale e-commerce sites a much-needed jolt of inspiration. “Online retail started around digital cameras. Now, sites are using the same engines to sell shirts, but that’s not the way they should be sold,” said Pasha Sadri, co-founder and chief executive of Polyvore. “Clothing is much more visual.” And unlike cameras or books, clothes and accessories are bought as part of a whole outfit, though many sites still show pieces of clothing individually.
Mr. Sadri, a corduroy-wearer who is not particularly fashion-forward himself, conceived the idea for Polyvore in 2007, while working at Yahoo. He was the software engineer behind Yahoo Pipes, a tool that allows people to pull together content from across the Web, similar to what Polyvore does.
When Polyvore users surf the Web, they use a tool called the Clipper, downloaded and saved on the toolbar, to select images and save them to Polyvore, where anyone can use them in a collage.
Brands and e-commerce sites can also upload their items to Polyvore, though today 95 percent of the images come from users. Polyvore attributes images with a hyperlink to the original site. (It gets about five requests a week, usually from photographers or painters, to remove images.)
To create a set, users drag and drop images and manipulate them. Polyvore also offers fonts for text, and audio clips from Amazon. Its 928,000 registered users create 28,000 new sets a day. A set inspired by Blake Lively, the “Gossip Girl” actress, includes a picture of her with a leather jacket similar to the one she is wearing, available on the Zadig & Voltaire Web site for $840. It also features accessories for the outfit, like Coach boots, Ray-Ban aviator sunglasses and a T-Mobile Sidekick.
On a blog called Boutonnieres & Bow Ties, brides-to-be submit photos of their wedding dresses. Samantha Shih, owner of a menswear company called 9Tailor, uses Polyvore to create the groom’s outfit, complete with tie and cuff links, and uploads it to her blog.
To increase revenue, Polyvore is engaging fashion companies to sponsor content on the site. Tory Burch promoted its summer collection, which was inspired by Venice, by running a contest on Polyvore that asked users to create Venetian-themed sets using the new Tory Burch pieces.
Lori’s Shoes, a boutique in Chicago and online, recently noticed a surge of traffic coming from Polyvore, which John Coyle Steinbrunner, the company’s creative director, had not heard of.
Now Lori’s Shoes wants to advertise on Polyvore. “It just gets us a better customer than banner ads or cost-per-click ads, they’re just instantly more loyal,” Mr. Steinbrunner said. “As opposed to just being a customer, they get to help determine what the look and aesthetic of the shoe is.”
Some online retailers, including Charlotte Russe and Torrid, license Polyvore’s technology to use on their own sites. Sucharita Mulpuru, an e-commerce analyst at Forrester Research, says she thinks licensing is the most promising use for Polyvore and competitors like Kaboodle.
“On the retail sites themselves, people are looking to be inspired and are down the funnel of the purchase process,” she said. But while using Polyvore’s site, “people are in a different mind-set, they’re looking to browse, they might not be looking to buy.”
Polyvore also plans to sell data on customer preferences it compiles on the site. It could potentially tell a retailer that a type of shoe is more popular in Manhattan than Los Angeles, so it would know where to stock the shoe. Or designers could upload images of new items before deciding to produce them to get input from fashion-savvy users.
It could also give buyers information about trends in real-time, faster than monthly magazines, said Jess Lee, Polyvore’s product manager. This fall, for example, watch for recent trends bubbling up on the site: exposed zippers, fingerless gloves and butterfly prints.
Posted on July 27, 2009 at 08:13 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
In a recent piece for The Atlantic, the designer Michael Bierut addressed the state of something on all of our minds these days. Money. Specifically, its design, which Bierut is none too happy about. On the back side of the U.S. dollar, we are faced, says Bierut, with the general effect of “a cake that has been decorated to within an inch of its life.” As for those enormous purple numbers added to deter counterfeiters a few years ago? “A denim patch on a satin dress,” says Bierut.
Charmed by the graphic perfection of Switzerland’s currency and the elephants and rhinos bursting forth from South Africa’s, Bierut thinks it’s time for a currency overhaul in this country. He points to the grassroots efforts of creative consultant Richard Smith, whose recent Dollar ReDe$ign project invited anyone to submit an idea. (Winning entries announced on July 4th can be viewed at this site.) “The only realistic way for a swift economic recovery,” Smith proposes, “is through a thorough, in-depth rebranding scheme — starting with the redesign of the iconic U.S. dollar.”
A good place to start? The mortgage industry. A national survey (appropriately pegged “The Perplexity Poll”) done by brand strategists Siegal & Gale in 2004 revealed that Americans continue to find many of the most common and important documents we interact with in our daily lives extremely, well, perplexing.
Photo by woodleywonderworks I’m right there with Bierut and Smith . . . and why stop there? Our entire economic system could do with a serious redesign. At the top of the list? Mortgage loan applications (followed closely by explanations of health benefits). Sixty percent of respondents rated mortgage documents as being “difficult to understand.”
As the illustrations below show, good design can make the nonsensical beautiful. But more importantly, it can help make what seems to be nonsense (the language of mortgage documents, the information hierarchy of health benefit explanations) clear.
I noticed recently that the new bank called Ally, Ally Bank’s anti-bank identity seems to have made considerable effort in the tone and graphic design of its advertisements to distance itself as much as possible from the traditional language of banking.
To be sure, the reasons for the mortgage crisis extend far beyond undecipherable documents but, as the design anthropologist Elizabeth Tunstall explains, people often didn’t (and still don’t, as they attempt to rework those flawed mortgages) understand what they were getting into. Much of the crisis was, quite simply, based on poor information. “The ability to implement policy is contingent on the way people interact with those policies,” Tunstall explains. “This is where the interaction between design and policy comes in.”
Health care offers another textbook case of how essential that interaction between design and policy can be. As the Obama administration advances its health care agenda, it would do well to recognize that it’s not just about policy and economics but how well information is presented to the broader public. Integral to the success of health care reform, Tunstall argues, is clear understanding of what’s to be gained. (Interestingly enough, Republicans recently issued this horrendous example of information design as a means to argue against the Democrats’ health care plan.)
Tunstall’s belief in the importance of design thinking has inspired her to lead the effort for a U.S. National Design Policy initiative, together with a consortium of some 30-odd U.S. design communities, including the AIGA (American Institute of Graphic Arts), IDSA (Industrial Design Society of America) and the AIA (American Institute of Architects). These groups have a long history of design advocacy in their respective areas (in fact, the AIGA is at work right now on a fact box, similar to the nutrition label, that will help citizens understand mortgage terms when they sign them) but according to Tunstall they’ve never been more aligned and ready to collaborate.

O.K., so I know what you’re thinking. We’ve got the economy to deal with, not to mention health care, crumbling infrastructure, education and climate change. And Iran, Iraq, Korea and Afghanistan. Why exactly do we need a design policy?
It’s a fair question, and the fact that a summit held to develop a blueprint for a national design policy last fall resulted in 250 different proposals does make me think this policy might simply have the effect of adding design to the top of the heap of governmental bureaucracy. To be sure, the goals put forth for a national design policy are ambitious, ranging from design innovation (protecting American intellectual property) to addressing the larger role of design in making American democratic values tangible to its citizenry. Projects on the agenda range from the readability of credit card term disclosures to walkable communities.
Yet, I still think it’s a good idea to pursue.
Why? As Janice Sterling, Director of Creative Services at the U.S. Government Printing Office and a strong ally of the initiative, explains, “Every week I give tours of the design studio here at GPO. Every week I must explain what we do and why it is important. Most people are not aware of what design is or how it influences their lives every day.”
Design touches all sectors of our daily life, and increasing awareness of that reality can result in tremendous benefit for all. Is design about aesthetics? Of course it is, but that’s just one of its many facets. Design can save time, money and one’s sanity. It can simplify use, enhance enjoyment, and keep us safe and well. I believe the National Design Policy can help to tangibly illustrate design’s value and help to keep it from being reduced to an afterthought, that “denim patch on a satin dress” Beirut is talking about.

Some designers I spoke to are less than thrilled with the whole design policy idea. An architect said emphatically, “Good design needs no spokesperson, needs no voice other than itself.” Yet I’m not convinced that’s always the case. Otherwise, we wouldn’t be living in, as I’ve heard one homeowner describe it, “a house with a Spanish Gothic front”, or driving Pontiac Aztecs through poorly designed intersections, and signing on for balloon payments, among countless examples. Design doesn’t need good PR; it needs to be recognized as essential to good practice. Anything that can help facilitate the importance of design as part of larger systems thinking is a positive.
One of the Design Policy summit’s immediate action steps was to propose a holistic design award encompassing all the design disciples — and it’s a great place to start. We’ve seen what decades of piecemeal planning and stopgap measures have done to vital parts of our country, from infrastructure to environmental policy. Designers as a group have a greater affinity toward interdisciplinary collaboration, and accordingly, could help push for a more participatory process in decision-making. The current sort of ivory-tower-ish obliviousness to what the guy down the hall is doing has got to change. De-silo-izing departments and disciplines can, I believe, result in more comprehensive policy making decisions.
For example, countless decisions on things like housing have been made without consideration of things like transportation and the environment (and vice versa). Under the Obama Administration, we’re already seeing such inter-departmental efforts like the Partnership for Sustainable Communities, which incorporates Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Department of Transportation (DOT), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
A more integrated design approach could result in a community designed around walkability, public transit and self-sufficiency. It could mean that the proposed health care reforms might actually include forms one could understand and health care facilities that focus on encouraging wellness rather than fixing illness. It could do something as straightforward as relaying the consequences of speeding (like this signage created for the Elm Grove Police Department in Wisconsin).
Concept and photography by Jim Jodie and Brian Steinseifer. What does frustrate me about the whole notion of a U.S. Design Policy is that the country needs one at all. It feels weird to have to defend design’s importance, yet also completely necessary. The United Kingdom has had a policy in place since 1949; Japan since 1956. In countries like Finland, Sweden, South Korea and the Netherlands, design is a no-brainer, reflected by the impeccable elegance, usability and readability of everything in those countries from currency to airport signage. These places support strong design policies and a deep-seated understanding and engagement of the value of design by their governments. More than the U.S. they seem willing to recognize the value of design both in terms of economic competitiveness and its benefit to quality of life.
A national design policy could also help to bolster American competitiveness at a time when we can use all the help we can get in that arena. We’re living in an age in which manufacturing is outsourced, design policy can enable the government to properly promote and measure the remaining competitive advantage of American goods and services: their design. As Tunstall puts it, “We need to capture design’s contributions to the economy. It’s all we have left.”
Posted on July 20, 2009 at 08:37 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
By Edwin Heathcote
Published: July 18 2009 01:36 | Last updated: July 18 2009 02:07
![]() |
| A visitor walks through Bekonscot model village |
Just below the algae-specked surface of the moat, monstrous fish glide past Epwood Castle. These horrible, bloated carp have bulging eyes as big as the boulders beneath the castle walls. A Brobdingnagian bird flies by, its wings casting a shadow over a whole suburban street, and then lands in a patch of green. Elsewhere, hundreds of people have been frozen solid in their tracks, captured in a moment, while clouds of smoke rise from the roof of a burnt-out building.
Bekonscot, squeezed between semis and a superstore in the pleasant dormitory town of Beaconsfield, is the most complete example of what appears to be a peculiarly English obsession, a whimsical cocktail of miniature villages, model railways and ornamental gardens. It is a second-hand picture of what life looked like in the Ladybird books of my schooldays.
Like most other model villages in England, it offers a snapshot of a bygone world of local shops, village greens, friendly bobbies, idyllic pubs and a perfect balance between town and country. However, the comforts of technology and the mechanisms of suburbanisation are all present: electric lights, steam trains; cars; delivery trucks; even an airport. There is a mine, a fishing village, a seaside town, a funfair, a zoo and that on-fire house, which is periodically extinguished by a static fire brigade. New models are added every year.
Miniaturisation is a recurring British cultural phenomenon. The richness of our children’s literature is unimaginable without it, from Gulliver’s Travels to Alice in Wonderland, The Wind in the Willows and The Borrowers. These are archetypal tales that play games with scale, humans exiled to tiny worlds or becoming playthings in the world of giants, or the tales of little people inhabiting miniature parallel worlds constructed from the detritus of our everyday existence.
The writer Will Self, a big fan of Bekonscot’s reduced reality, picks up on the theme in his druggy short story “Scale” in which the morphine-addicted protagonist lives beside the model village and is surprised to find a replica of his own house there, which he enters only to find another, yet smaller version, and so on. All Self’s works were recently reissued with jackets based on Liam Bailey’s photographs of blurry, scaleless figures taken at ground level at Bekonscot.
There are 17 other model villages in the UK open to the public. Some, like the one at Corfe Castle, capture a historic moment (before the town was destroyed in the civil war), others the moment they were built, like the beautiful village at Wimborne Minster, completed in 1951, which has become a curious mirror of the real and now far less picturesque town. All are the result of passionate hobbyists’ desire for completeness, for accuracy in the relentless search for miniaturisation.
Tim Dunn, 28, who works in online marketing, has long been involved with Bekonscot, having grown up locally, and still volunteers there. He is also an expert on the history of model villages. “The earliest model villages were very rural,” he says. “The first ones were in people’s gardens and they were about creating a vision of a rural England that never existed. They began in cottage gardens and their scale is appropriate to that. The buildings are vernacular, rural because that was also what was appropriate. Bekonscot began as a ‘Swiss village’ of a kind that was popular at the time in ornamental gardens.”
But aren’t most of the villages we see today suburban rather than rural or Alpine? “They are a product of their environment. The people who built the ones we see today lived in the suburbs and they tended to be built on a whim rather than with a masterplan, growing from a few houses into a village.” But there is also, Dunn proposes, an idealism, even utopianism at work. “There’s some evidence to suggest that Callingham built Bekonscot not to show how life had been but how it could be. It is a miniature version of the Garden City movement.”
This didacticism is highlighted in the correspondence between the two meanings of “model village”. There is the miniature and there is the exemplar. The latter group includes Saltaire in Bradford, the vision of Victorian factory owner and philanthropist Titus Salt. Now a Unesco World Heritage site, it is one of many utopian settlements built in response to the brutal conditions of the industrial world. Dame Henrietta Barnett’s posh Hampstead Garden Suburb in its frozen tweeness is the model of the Arts & Crafts fantasy .
These model villages remain a powerful part of the British psyche. But today we have returned to an even earlier, feudal model with Poundbury, built on Duchy of Cornwall land in Dorchester, Dorset, using the Prince of Wales’s principles on town planning, a paradigm of traditional values and design. It is, in its way, as weird as Bekonscot, a toy-town plaything blown up rather than reduced.
Sam Jacob, a British architect whose practice FAT makes wonderful buildings that look like joyful toys blown up to actual scale, is intrigued by model villages. “Modern landscapes can be alienating, seemingly indifferent to you as an individual,” he says. “By shrinking the town it changes the power relationship. They are a way of compressing reality into something more digestible and they allow you to get a sense of the whole society working. It’s a way of seeing and understanding how the world works. What is it that makes a place? What is it that makes a society? What makes us? It overcomes our alienation by giving us a god’s-eye perspective.”
God’s eye or Godzilla’s eye? There is something very strange about seeing children towering over houses and churches. Model villages may have been conceived in a spirit of nostalgia and affection but there is something undeniably creepy about the leap in scale from macro to micro. Even jovial Tim Dunn can’t help but agree: “There can be something Stepford Wives about it, the Village of the Damned.”
It is this uneasiness and sense of the sinister that has made the miniature a recurring motif in art. Last year Rachel Whiteread exhibited her impressive collection of second hand doll’s houses at the Hayward Gallery’s Psycho Buildings. Illuminated from inside but emptied of life and both decorated with and haunted by the remnants of former owners’ left-over wallpapers they glowed eerily in the dark gallery. “It’s a suburban vision of England,” she told me in a deadpan voice.
The
London-based Dutch artist Madelon Vriesendorp makes landscapes that are
densely populated by endless crowds of badly manufactured Statues of
Liberty, Mickey Mice, Leaning Towers of Pisa, Smurfs and Mexican Day of
the Dead skeletons. This teeming city is the contemporary, urban
version, the global model village, a wonderful riot of outrageous
difference and badly remembered, garish images. Vriesendorp, married to
architect Rem Koolhaas (whose passion in architecture is, ironically,
what he has termed “bigness”), fondly remembers taking their children
to Bekonscot: “Children don’t really know about scale. Ours used to get
down to the level of the houses on their hands and knees and imagine
themselves part of it, just like boys get their heads right down on the
floor to play with their cars, putting themselves into the
perspective.” If there is a sense in which the model village is a
peculiarly English phenomenon, deeply embedded in a particular idea of
yearning for a romanticised past, there is, in fact, nothing
particularly English about them – it is more that the English
themselves would like to see this kind of eccentricity as unique and
central to their being.
According to Will Self, “Bekonscot is a simulacrum of small town middle England, a timeless arcadia. It is a depiction of the sort of place Prince Charles would be happy for us all to live, a silver-wedding, commemorative-plate, biscuit-tin place.”
In fact, as the poster for the International Association of Miniature Parks at Bekonscot shows, this is a truly international phenomenon. What is compelling about the national variants is the distinct agenda that each brings to their interpretation of the theme. Mini-Europe in Brussels is an impressively, almost obsessively, detailed amalgam of European capitals, which are placed intimately close to each other, a closeness they never have in the nearby real parliament.
The Dutch mini-city of Madurodam in The Hague was conceived in part as a war memorial. After the completion of Schipol airport, it became the biggest construction project in the Netherlands.
These miniature villages almost exclusively concentrate on a banal version of tourist cliché or local nostalgia. The only modernist building in Bekonscot is an homage to Berthold Lubetkin’s spiralling concrete penguin pool (1934) in London Zoo. Dunn justifies this quite sensibly: “It’s much easier to build a tiny half-timbered cottage than a glass skyscraper. Also, all model villages are built by obsessives. A fixed date in the past gives them a focus.”
There was a brief moment in the mid-20th century when the first Futurama began to take off, most notably the futuristic vision of a potential city shown at the New York World’s Fair of 1939. This was a modernist fantasy of a 1960s of freeways and skyscrapers.
Do Bekonscot and the Futurama, built only a decade apart, tell us anything about ourselves, about our own cities? Self says, “The small scale is fascinating but also, when you look up close, you see how distorted these figures are. It also brings attention to the disparities in scale inherent in our own built environment. If you look closely at the models and the shop displays, then pull back from the small view, it all looks wrong, the scale of the grass, then trains. Our own cities are just as out of scale.”
Perhaps it is that combination of the ideal and the strange, the controlled and static miniature world and the huge and frightening changing world that draws generations of children and, perhaps more importantly, their parents, back to Bekonscot and its descendants. Ultimately, these model villages are a suburban riposte to the romanticism of the English garden with its follies, grottoes and fake ruins. Both refer to half-remembered, half-mythical, bucolic worlds, one of arcadia and the other of suburbia. “In some ways,” says Self, “the miniature is the archetypal artwork. In its own way even the Sistine Chapel is a miniature. I always refer to what Claude Lévi-Strauss said, ‘When we alter scale we sacrifice the sensible in favour of the intelligible.’”
Ultimately, that is what these miniature places do. They allow us, as in a dream, to step outside the everyday and perceive it instead from above. It then becomes something full of wonder, just as the most mundane and familiar landscape becomes mesmerically fascinating when seen from an aircraft. These tiny towns transform through scale and, through making everything artificial and strange, make it all fascinating again.
Bekonscot’s birthday celebrations are on August 5;www.bekonscot.co.uk
Edwin Heathcote is the FT’s architecture correspondent
..................................................
A close-up view of miniature art
Miniature art first became fashionable in the 1500s, when there was a vogue for painted portrait miniatures at Henry VIII’s court, writes Isabel Berwick. Five hundred years later, artists continue to find inspiration in tiny representations of people and places, and by playing with our notions of scale.
![]() |
| Willard Wigan’s ‘Nine Camels in the Eye of a Needle’ |
Museum in a Shoebox is
a new online project that mimics a real art museum, complete with café
with model people in it and a model summer pavilion in the grounds.
Created by the Swedish artist Kristina Dalberg, it presents real and imaginary works by real and imaginary artists.
www.museuminashoebox.com
Charles LeDray, a New York-based artist, has a show called Men’s Suits
featuring racks of hand-made, scaled down suits and other men’s
clothes. The show, which runs until September 20 at the Fire Station in
London W1, took three years to prepare and each piece is perfect but
scaled down for tiny people of 2½ft tall.
www.artangel.org.uk
Thomas Doyle,
a US artist, makes works on a 1:43 scale and smaller. These complex and
peopled worlds are often enclosed under glass, “allowing for the
intimacy one might feel peering into a museum display case or doll’s
house”, says Doyle.
www.thomasdoyle.net
Ron Mueck is a well-known Australia-born “hyper-realist” working in the UK who began as a TV model-maker and now produces minutely detailed and disturbing human models, scaled down – and scaled up. His work includes “Man in Blankets”, an old man scaled down, and “Boy”, a 5m model of an adolescent made for London’s Millennium Dome.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009
Posted on July 17, 2009 at 07:31 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Recent Comments